ABR and x264 HQ-Insane, HQ-Slowest, HQ-Slower vs. LAME --alt-preset insane, extreme >> JavaScript Programming Language >> FORUM for IT
FORUM for IT

FORUM for IT



SearchSearch   Users   Registration   Entrance
Today: 14.07.2025 - 18:27:56
Pages:  1  

ABR and x264 HQ-Insane, HQ-Slowest, HQ-Slower vs. LAME --alt-preset insane, extreme

Advertising

.
AuthorMessage

BimmerXTC

user




Statistics:
Messages: 152
Registration: 02.26.2001

If you want an analogy, lame's most similar options are -q / -f / -h.

---------------------
Buy my '02 325 Ci sport
Message # 1 06.08.20 - 23:03:20
RE: ABR and x264 HQ-Insane, HQ-Slowest, HQ-Slower vs. LAME --alt-preset insane, extreme

foRRREVerz

user




Statistics:
Messages: 780
Registration: 01.29.2002

Hi akupenguin, My only acquaintance with lame is using it with the presets, so I am not very clear on what the other options mean. When you use the switch -q/-f/-h do you also have to supply a bitrate? (You don't with the presets)

---------------------
Vagina- The box a pen!s comes in.
Message # 2 06.08.20 - 23:14:42
RE: ABR and x264 HQ-Insane, HQ-Slowest, HQ-Slower vs. LAME --alt-preset insane, extreme

dragon216

user




Statistics:
Messages: 235
Registration: 09.27.2003

There is no analogy using only lame presets. The idea of x264 profiles is that they increase the coding efficiency. This means you either get a higher quality stream in the same amount of space, or the same quality stream in a lower amount of space (or some combination of both).

---------------------
Message # 3 06.08.20 - 23:26:16
RE: ABR and x264 HQ-Insane, HQ-Slowest, HQ-Slower vs. LAME --alt-preset insane, extreme
File sharing - sorta OT, but maybe helpful : Previous topic
Pages:  1  

The administrator has prohibited guests from replying to messages! To register, follow the link: register


Participants