Convolution3D

MCoG DVD 

Spacial-temporal filter 

Convolution3d is great filter (I use it), but I am looking specially for filter, which a) for unmoving parts of frame using temporal filtering b) for moving parts of frame using spacial filtering Do you know something, please?

MAM can be used to apply temporal filter on low motion parts and spatial filter on high motion parts.

@Acaila and drizztcanrender, Any fresh news about your filtering/convolution3d tests with your "DVD rips"? ;) best regards, iago

>hear, hear! the mother of all noise filters for analogue caps - thank you vlad and bb - hmm, as i said previously, i think it's ready to go on doom9's download page - those folks in the "capturing video" forum would be all over it, if they knew it existed _have you all lost your mind??????????[here goes one "folk" from capturing video forum] this filter is nothing but ANOTHER DNR....(by results it gives..) & boy ohh boy did i tried it! i've tried about 20(!) different combinations(especially for temporal part) & found that IT CANNOT REMOVE NOISE IN NON-MOVING-CAMERA scenes (i've come up to "200"(!!!)& more for temporal part of the filter:noise was still there!!!just as with any other vdub's DNR filter....) video was noisy,but no more than i ecounter every day& filter it nice with temp.smoother:still scenes on output have NO NOISE with t.s_.....convolution(what's this name anyway????) CANNOT stack to vdub's tsmoother! HarryM said this:"Convolution3d is great filter (I use it), but I am looking specially for filter, which a) for unmoving parts of frame using temporal filtering b) for moving parts of frame using spacial filtering Do you know something, please?" _&wasn't this objective for c3d?to merge 2 filters in one? also someone else mentioned "why not use 2 separate filters"-->it seems we'll have to until someone does real hard-core t/s smoothing filter! but again_nothing wrong with using 2 filters is it...? or is it just that ALL the poeple on this forum take dvd as a source /which already doesn't have any noise to start with/ & then denoise that....(this is NOT what denoiser's are ment to be used with!)-what's the point in sending "TESTS" with "SCREENSHOTS" when dvd was the source???(i've dloaded 2 of these:nothing to see on them_nothing that would interest capturers...DENOISERS should BE for capturers...) by your results i see that no one of you dealt with noisy vhs source,so this filter cannot be even mentioned in capturing context! [so please mention it NOT in that context no more!]